J'ai been challenged to configure et setup a HA Hyper-v Cluster that will jamais go down.
J'ai mainly seulement used VMWare for clustering et HA.
My question how can i run a Hyper-V cluster like a VMWare cluster?
In VMWare i can install et exécutez le vCSA to configure le shared networking, datastores, HA, DRS, vmotion, Affinity, resource pools, etc.
Does hyper-v come avec something similar, J'ai tried to use SCVMM 2016 twice et for certains reason le errors et non stop et i ne peut pas get it to work.
If that is le best ou seulement option let me know et I will figure it out, mais si there is something better( Je sais best ou better maybe an opinion )
Je suis pas looking for open source ou cheap.
(Yes i know why pas buy le VMWare licences? J'ai to rule out hyper-V first)
Second part to le question, Does Hyper-V offer le même features to that of VMWare?
The main ones I would be looking for:
Distributed Switches
HA
DRS
Vmotion - Technology Migration
Host Affinity
Comment exécuter Hyper-V comme VMware
Re: Comment exécuter Hyper-V comme VMware
Hyper-V vs VMware
SCOM (System Center Operation Manager)
SCO (System Center Orchestrator)
SCVMM (System Center Virtual Machine Manager)
Surprisingly Hyper-V can run like VMware better in certains ways, there is a major gotcha that Microsoft throws in there qui I will put at le end. Je suis pas going to go into too much detail about networking as that is a différent topic.
Things that were needed (no particular order)
Two shared storage appliances, Using le builtin Hyper-V replication you can have Fault Tolerance in that le vhdx files are kept in sync et through SCO et SCVMM you can configure si a VM goes down le autre one will be spun up to take its place.
Load Balancer, using host affinity aussi setup in le SCVMM you can select qui host a VM will be on et aussi qui host a VM should jamais be on.
The pros:
Single pane of glass pas seulement do you get le VMware functionally mais you aussi get certains très utile Remote monitoring et management (RMM) tools, to keep system updated, antivirus, etc.
Honestly that is about it.
Cons:
Extremely hard to setup. Vous devez to have 3 différent servers for chaque of le SC products, J'étais using le Eval Copies mais as far as i know in production chaque product must be on physical boxes (3), et si one goes down you will lose le functionality of le that server so to ensure votre environment jamais goes down you have 2 servers (6) that are clustered et in sync.
The Eval copies were pas easy to setup there is très little documentation online however le Microsoft Virtual Academy has certains really great walk through videos that si you manage to get tous le systems setup et to le le plus recent build numbers (Very important!!!) walk you through how to setup et configure everything. Also make sure votre SCVMM server name does pas contain SCVMM.
The price, here is où they get you, $3,607 PER CORE, 16 core minimum Equaling $57,712, now that does get you everything. Compared to VMWare $31,908 (2 Proc) for 3 hosts. qui aussi gets you everything, (vSphere avec Operations Management Enterprise Plus) Basically you would need to have 5.5 VMWare hosts avant you would see tout cost savings, depending on votre environment how beaucoup de you need.
SCOM (System Center Operation Manager)
SCO (System Center Orchestrator)
SCVMM (System Center Virtual Machine Manager)
Surprisingly Hyper-V can run like VMware better in certains ways, there is a major gotcha that Microsoft throws in there qui I will put at le end. Je suis pas going to go into too much detail about networking as that is a différent topic.
Things that were needed (no particular order)
Two shared storage appliances, Using le builtin Hyper-V replication you can have Fault Tolerance in that le vhdx files are kept in sync et through SCO et SCVMM you can configure si a VM goes down le autre one will be spun up to take its place.
Load Balancer, using host affinity aussi setup in le SCVMM you can select qui host a VM will be on et aussi qui host a VM should jamais be on.
The pros:
Single pane of glass pas seulement do you get le VMware functionally mais you aussi get certains très utile Remote monitoring et management (RMM) tools, to keep system updated, antivirus, etc.
Honestly that is about it.
Cons:
Extremely hard to setup. Vous devez to have 3 différent servers for chaque of le SC products, J'étais using le Eval Copies mais as far as i know in production chaque product must be on physical boxes (3), et si one goes down you will lose le functionality of le that server so to ensure votre environment jamais goes down you have 2 servers (6) that are clustered et in sync.
The Eval copies were pas easy to setup there is très little documentation online however le Microsoft Virtual Academy has certains really great walk through videos that si you manage to get tous le systems setup et to le le plus recent build numbers (Very important!!!) walk you through how to setup et configure everything. Also make sure votre SCVMM server name does pas contain SCVMM.
The price, here is où they get you, $3,607 PER CORE, 16 core minimum Equaling $57,712, now that does get you everything. Compared to VMWare $31,908 (2 Proc) for 3 hosts. qui aussi gets you everything, (vSphere avec Operations Management Enterprise Plus) Basically you would need to have 5.5 VMWare hosts avant you would see tout cost savings, depending on votre environment how beaucoup de you need.