Pourquoi utiliser DHCPv6 plutôt que l'autoconfiguration d'adresse sans état ?
Pourquoi utiliser DHCPv6 plutôt que l'autoconfiguration d'adresse sans état ?
IPv6 et [RFC 2462](http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2462.txt) provide a means for hosts to configure leur own IP addresses via stateless address autoconfiguration. To me this seems like le bee's knees, et it leaves me wondering why someone would want to go through le trouble of configuring a DHCPv6 server instead. Je ne manage networks as a profession, so Je suis guessing that there are certains obvious simple reasons why one would want to support DHCPv6 that ne occur to me. Could someone please elaborate on what these reasons might be?
Re: Pourquoi utiliser DHCPv6 plutôt que l'autoconfiguration d'adresse sans état ?
DHCPv6 provides more control to le administrator in assigning addresses. If you really want that sort of control over votre IPv6 addresses, you ne understand IPv6 yet.
It aussi can be used to provide additional configuration parameters beyond le basic address/gateway supported through autoconfiguration. An example might be WINS servers, NTP servers, TFTP boot servers, et autre less common options. None of qui are worth le pain of deploying a DHCPv6 architecture in mon opinion.
Stick avec autoconfig.
It aussi can be used to provide additional configuration parameters beyond le basic address/gateway supported through autoconfiguration. An example might be WINS servers, NTP servers, TFTP boot servers, et autre less common options. None of qui are worth le pain of deploying a DHCPv6 architecture in mon opinion.
Stick avec autoconfig.